January 12, 2024 | Kimberly Jolivette Williams, CPC, CPB, CPMA, CPC-I, CANPC, CCC, CEMC
Navigating the Importance of the Diagnosis in the Audit Landscape: In our complex and evolving healthcare business landscape, where financial integrity and regulatory compliance are paramount, medical audits stand as a critical tool for safeguarding the fiscal health of medical practices and entities. As a seasoned medical auditor, I find that considering diagnoses in documentation reviews is pivotal, especially when aligning with medical necessity guidelines set forth by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and various insurance carriers.
Per LinkedIn Influencer Scott Kraft on The Compliance Guy, “Medical Necessity is the Foundation of which the house of the note is built.”
In this article, I’ll spread my Kimberlyism potpourri on the significance of diagnosis specificity in medical audits, providing tailored insights for the audience of medical professionals seeking to optimize their business practices.
Implementing the 2024 ICD-10-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification) is a game-changer, elevating documentation standards and facilitating a thorough approach to healthcare record-keeping.
As a medical auditor, my lens is focused on ensuring that every diagnosis is not just a templated entry from a prior clinical encounter or judgment but a medically documented reality within the present encounter.
Understanding the Audit Imperative:
Medical audits are a proactive measure to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis coding and the completeness of medical documentation and ensure abidance to regulatory requirements and optimal financial performance. Whether you operate a medical practice, hospital, or healthcare entity, the audit process is central to maintaining compliance, mitigating risks, and maximizing revenue. HCC (Hierarchical Condition Category) audits focus on risk adjustment coding and assessing the severity of patient conditions. RADV (Risk Adjustment Data Validation) audits by CMS scrutinize MA plans’ documentation and coding accuracy. Retrospective audits review past records, prospective audits evaluate future practices, and concurrent audits assess ongoing processes in real-time. Each audit type serves a unique purpose, collectively warranting comprehensive dependability to coding guidelines and regulatory standards and fostering continuous improvement in healthcare practices for providers and payers.
Diagnoses are the foundation upon which the entire audit process is built. They provide auditors with the context needed to assess the appropriateness of clinical services, the validity of coding, and the overall quality of patient care. A comprehensive audit, therefore, requires a meticulous examination of diagnoses to confirm they align with the patient’s medical history and the services provided.
The 2024 ICD-10-CM, with its heightened specificity, promotes reducing the margin for error in documentation. This not only fosters precision in patient care but also fortifies the financial accuracy of healthcare institutions, as codes directly correlate with reimbursement of services and resource allocation.
From an auditing perspective, the more precise the diagnosis, the more robust the foundation for treatment plans and interventions.
The Regulatory Guideposts:
A profound grasp of the regulatory framework is essential, mainly focusing on the CMS Medicare Coverage Database (MCD), which encompasses the National Coverage Determinations (NCDs), Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs), and the Articles diverse payer policies of commercial insurance carriers. These guidelines delineate the parameters for coverage criteria, diagnosis coding, and medical necessity, laying the foundation for meticulous audits and vigorous compliance adaptation.
The Medicare Coverage Database (MCD) stands as a cornerstone resource for auditors, offering a centralized repository of coverage policies. This invaluable tool facilitates the cross-referencing and validating of diagnostic and procedural information during audits, prompting alignment with Medicare regulations and commercial insurance carrier policies.
- CMS NCDs, or National Coverage Determinations, are pivotal national policy decisions specifying when Medicare covers specific services. To ensure compliance with national policies, adherence to NCDs is crucial in audits.
- Additionally, Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) crafted by Medicare Administrative Contractors provide nuanced guidance on coverage and coding at the local level. Auditors must consider NCDs, LCDs, and Articles to capture regional and local intricacies in coverage requirements. https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/MLN/Educational-Tools/MLN901347-How-to-MCD/mcd/mcd/index.html
Healthcare providers must proactively understand Medicare coverage parameters before offering services to Medicare patients. Given the wealth of coverage information available, providers are expected to anticipate payment denial by being well-versed in Medicare coverage and diagnosis criteria requirements. This refined understanding of regulatory frameworks empowers healthcare providers to navigate audits with precision and compliance.
Medicare Advantage (MA) plans receive payments from CMS through Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs), a model also adopted by private payers and ACOs for risk adjustment. A higher patient disease burden results in increased payments, factoring in risk scores based on demographics, such as age, gender, disability status, and location. Recent Office of the Inspector General (OIG) audits raised concerns about upcoding by MA plans, leading CMS to implement changes for 2024. These adjustments aim to address and rectify coding discrepancies, promoting a fair and precise representation of patient health status for optimal reimbursement in the evolving landscape of healthcare audits. RADV audits are the main corrective action for those improper payments.
While Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding isn’t my wheelhouse on a daily focus, I’m confident its role in value-based reimbursement will influence 2024 diagnosis coding. Its significance is evident in the v28 payment calendar year 2024, shaping the considerations for correct and impactful diagnosis coding.
The newly introduced OIG Medicare Advantage (MA) Toolkit provides MA insurance carriers with an essential snapshot to replicate OIG techniques for identifying and assessing high-risk diagnosis codes. This empowers MA organizations to warrant precise payments and elevate care for enrollees. Under Medicare Part C, CMS compensates MA insurance carriers monthly based on enrollees’ diagnoses, using a risk adjustment system to accommodate variations in healthcare resource utilization.
Misdiagnoses are pivotal red flags requiring thorough examination. The toolkit, a response to CMS’s identification of high-risk miscoding diagnosis codes, focuses on potential miscoding circumstances utilized in OIG audits, enhancing accuracy in medical coding.
This invaluable resource confirms payment accuracy for diagnoses and instills a commitment to providing optimal healthcare resources where needed. It aligns with evolving standards for comprehensive medical diagnosis audits, fostering a healthcare environment grounded in precision and commitment to patient well-being.
https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region7/72301213.asp
https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region7/72301213.pdf
Importance of the Diagnosis Potpourri Conclusion:
The interplay between a medical diagnosis and documentation is at the core of ensuring quality healthcare. Where regulatory compliance is non-negotiable, medical professionals must recognize the pivotal role of diagnoses in audits.
As we step into 2024, the implementation of the updated ICD-10-CM elevates the standards of precision and clarity in healthcare documentation. Through the lens of an auditor, this translates into compliance and defensibility of healthcare diagnoses practices.
The call to action is clear: embrace the symbiotic relationship between diagnosis, documentation, and coding standards, recognizing that precision in practice is the cornerstone of effective and accountable healthcare.
As we tread into the future of healthcare, let the focus on diagnoses in audits serve as a beacon, guiding medical professionals toward sustained success in an ever-evolving business of the healthcare industry.
Are you interested in enhancing your medical auditing skills? Look no further than NAMAS, a division of DoctorsManagement, LLC. Since 1956, we’ve been a premier full-service medical consulting firm, dedicated to providing top-notch auditing education, resources, training, and services. Our team of experienced auditors and educators have a minimum of a CPC and CPMA certification, as well as at least 10 years of auditing-specific experience. Not only did we create the AAPC-affiliated CPMA credential, but our instructors continue to be the go-to authorities in auditing. We’ve educated DOJ and RAC auditors, CMS and Medicare Advantage Auditors, physician and hospital-based auditing professionals, and many more. We’re confident in our ability to help you grow and excel in the auditing and compliance field. Join our proud alumni of successful auditors and take your career to the next level with NAMAS.
