The Auditor’s Role in Appeals: A Key Player in the Compliance Process
Written by: Betty Hovey, BSHAM CCS-P CDIP CPC COC CPMA CPCD CPB CPCI
The appeals process is a critical component of health care compliance, ensuring that denied claims are appropriately challenged and reconsidered. When providers and health care organizations receive claim denials, they often require skilled professionals to navigate the appeals process. In these cases, auditors play a crucial role, serving as subject matter experts, strategists, and compliance advocates.
Understanding the Appeals Process
Before diving into the auditor’s role, it’s important to understand the structure of the appeals process. When a provider or health care organization disagrees with a claim denial—whether from a commercial payor, Medicare, or Medicaid—they have the right to appeal.
For Medicare claims, the appeal process consists of five levels:
- Redetermination: A request for the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) to review the denial.
- Reconsideration: A review by a Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC).
- Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Hearing: A more formal appeal in front of an ALJ.
- Medicare Appeals Council Review: A review by the Departmental Appeals Board.
- Judicial Review: If all previous levels are unsuccessful, a case can be taken to federal court.
While commercial payors may have different appeal structures, the underlying principles remain the same—each stage requires strong evidence, proper documentation, and a well-articulated argument for reconsideration. This is where auditors become essential.
The Auditor’s Role in Appeals
Reviewing the Claim Denial
The first step in any appeal is to conduct a thorough analysis of the claim denial. Auditors must:
- Identify specific reasons for the denial.
- Examine the documentation that was originally submitted.
- Determine whether coding and billing guidelines support the claim.
- Assess whether additional information is needed to strengthen the appeal.
At this stage, auditors should also evaluate whether the denial was based on incorrect interpretations of guidelines or payor policies.
Gathering Supporting Documentation
Once the claim denial has been reviewed, auditors play a key role in gathering the necessary supporting documentation for the appeal. This may include:
- Medical records that substantiate the services billed.
- Provider notes and rationale for medical necessity.
- Payor policy guidelines that support the claim.
- Coding guidelines and official coding resources.
- Previous successful appeal decisions (if applicable).
Having a well-organized and comprehensive appeal package is essential for a strong case.
Crafting the Appeal Argument
A successful appeal isn’t just about having the right documentation—it’s also about presenting a clear, compelling argument. Auditors assist in drafting appeal letters that:
- Clearly state why the claim denial was incorrect.
- Reference relevant regulations, coding guidelines, and payor policies.
- Provide concise yet thorough explanations of medical necessity.
- Address any payor-specific rules or requirements that support the provider’s case.
The key is to remain factual, professional, and persuasive while adhering to the payor’s appeal submission guidelines.
The Difference Between Coders and Auditors in Appeals
While both coders and auditors can assist in the appeals process, their roles differ significantly in scope and approach.
- Coders focus primarily on ensuring correct code selection based on provider documentation and payor guidelines. When assisting in appeals, they typically help clarify whether the initial coding was accurate and if adjustments are necessary.
- Auditors, on the other hand, take a broader approach. They not only review coding accuracy but also assess compliance, medical necessity, and documentation sufficiency to build a comprehensive appeal strategy.
Auditors are more involved in evaluating whether the denial points to systemic issues, such as incorrect documentation patterns or misinterpretation of payor guidelines. They often lead the development of appeal letters, citing regulations, payor policies, and clinical documentation standards to substantiate the claim. Coders may assist in early-stage appeals, focusing on technical coding details, while auditors often engage in higher-level appeals, working with compliance officers and legal teams when cases escalate to Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearings or beyond.
By understanding these distinctions, health care organizations can leverage both coders and auditors effectively to maximize their chances of successful appeals.
Working with Providers and Legal Teams
In more complex appeals—especially those at higher levels—auditors often collaborate with providers, compliance officers, and legal teams. Their expertise ensures that:
- Providers understand the reasons behind denials and how to improve future documentation.
- Compliance teams can implement corrective action plans if systemic issues are identified.
- Legal representatives have the technical coding and regulatory knowledge needed for higher-level appeals.
Auditors act as a bridge between clinical, administrative, and legal teams, ensuring a well-rounded and compliant appeal strategy.
Providing Education and Process Improvement
Beyond handling individual appeals, auditors play a proactive role in preventing future denials. This includes:
- Educating providers and staff on documentation best practices.
- Identifying trends in denials and addressing systemic issues.
- Implementing internal audits to catch and correct errors before external reviews.
- Updating policies and procedures based on appeal outcomes.
By taking a forward-thinking approach, auditors help reduce the frequency of appeals and improve overall compliance.
Best Practices for Auditors in Appeals
To maximize success in appeals, auditors should follow these best practices:
- Stay Up to Date on Regulations – Keeping current with Medicare guidelines, payor policies, and coding updates is critical for accurate appeal arguments.
- Be Detail-Oriented – Carefully reviewing medical records and coding documentation ensures that no key details are overlooked.
- Use Data to Support Appeals – Leveraging statistical data and past successful appeals can strengthen the case.
- Maintain a Professional Tone – Avoid adversarial language in appeal letters and focus on factual, evidence-based arguments.
- Track Appeal Outcomes – Maintaining records of previous appeals helps identify patterns and refine future strategies.
Auditors are vital players in the appeals process, providing the expertise needed to challenge inaccurate claim denials and protect provider reimbursements. By thoroughly reviewing denials, gathering supporting documentation, crafting strong appeal arguments, and collaborating with key stakeholders, auditors help health care organizations navigate the complex world of appeals.
Moreover, their role extends beyond appeals—by educating providers and implementing process improvements, auditors contribute to long-term compliance and financial stability. For health care organizations looking to strengthen their appeals process, investing in skilled auditors is a strategic and necessary move.
Ready to strengthen your auditing expertise in appeals?
Join NAMAS for live webinars, bootcamps, and expert-led resources designed to elevate your role in healthcare compliance and documentation excellence.
About the Author: Betty A. Hovey, BSHAM, CCS-P, CDIP, CPC, COC, CPMA, CPCD, CPB, CPC-I
Betty is a nationally recognized health care consultant and speaker. She is an expert auditor and loves to help practices stay compliant and profitable. Betty’s philosophy is, “Physicians work hard for their patients and they should be paid properly for what they do.”
Betty brings over thirty-five years of healthcare experience to the table and has spent years on the “front lines” for practices handling medical billing, coding, claims, and denials. She has also managed practices and directed health care system departments.
