Production VS Quality: What We Forget When We Audit Fast
Article Reference Code: NAMAS.03.27.2026
Written by: Sonal Patel, BA, CPMA, CPC, CMC
In large organizations, certified medical auditing professionals are faced with competing metrics: production auditing versus quality auditing. Leadership within these entities often set high-volume expectations for their medical auditors to expedite and complete per day. Medical auditors are often given a work queue for various multispecialty practitioners, from different entities, in different states without considering the necessary pivots medical auditors must make when utilizing resources, coding guidelines, and regulatory compliance guidance to draft their findings.
When medical auditors are faced with such production pressure, documentation reviews are often rushed. Auditing under these circumstances, deep analysis is traded in for superficial scanning, resulting in significant missed opportunities and increased organizational risk.
What is missed in documentation when audits are conducted too fast?
Here are five crucial categories that are forgotten when certified medical auditors are instructed to focus on production over quality:
- Clinical Nuance and Context (The “Why”)
Focus on Checklists: Rushed audits often focus on checking if a box was ticked in the electronic medical record (EMR) rather than if the clinical documentation supports the diagnosis.
Unsupported Medical Necessity: Auditors may see the diagnosis on the claim but miss that the clinical documentation does not justify the intensity of the treatment provided.
Vague Documentation: Clinical nuances, such as why a patient was on a specific medication or why a certain procedure was necessary, are overlooked, leading to denials for lack of medical necessity.
Chronic Condition Management: Clinical documentation might show a patient has diabetes, but a quick audit may fail to confirm the condition was managed during the specific encounter, invalidating the service under payor standards and correct coding guidelines.
- Copy-and-Paste Overload (Double Vision Trap)
With all the tools available in today’s EMRs, clinical documentation is often “carried forward,” or “cloned,” from visit to visit.
Cloned Documentation: A fast audit fails to notice that the daily progress note is an exact replica of the previous day, despite a change in the patient’s condition.
Outdated Information: Key details about a patient’s current, evolving status are missed because the audit did not catch that the provider was simply reviewing a note from the previous day.
- Missing Structural Elements (Authentication and Accuracy)
When searching only for coding accuracy to meet production metrics, auditors often skip the deeper aspects of the medical record that are crucial for legal and billing audits.
Missing Signatures/Authentications: A record might be complete in content but lack a valid electronic signature, rendering it invalid for reimbursement according to payor policies.
Incorrect Dates or Times: Misdated entries can cause serious legal risks and missed clues regarding time-sensitive treatments (e.g., in sepsis or stroke protocols).
- Hidden Overpayments and Underpayments
Rushed audits often focus only on the high-cost items, missing “low-hanging fruit” that significantly impacts the revenue cycle.
Upcoding/Downcoding Errors: If not carefully reviewed, an auditor may fail to catch that a moderate-level visit was billed as high-level, inviting fraud investigations, or miss that a lower-level visit was billed when the documentation supported a higher one (missed revenue).
Modifiers: Improperly used or omitted modifiers (e.g., modifier 25 or 59) are often missed, leading to unnecessary denials of services.
- Clinical Safety and Continuity of Care Risks
Auditing is not only about money; it is also about patient safety. Fast audits miss gaps that can put patients in danger.
Medication Discrepancies: A rapid review might miss that a medication was stopped but not properly documented as discontinued.
Allergy and History Gaps: Missing allergies, family history, or social history can have direct impacts on subsequent patient care.
Wrong Chart Entries: In a rush, a note for a patient with a similar name might be improperly placed in another chart, leading to dangerous clinical errors.
The Consequences of Rushed Auditing
When audits are too fast, organizations miss coded data quality issues. Inaccurate coding distorts or misrepresents clinical documentation, undermining quality reporting, risk adjustment, as well as clinical research.
Furthermore, the lack of specificity in auditing can lead to a vicious cycle where the provider is unable to fix the errors because they do not know what was missed. This leads to not only significant revenue loss through denied claims, delayed or underpaid claims, but potential legal repercussions as well, such as lawsuits or charges of negligence.
Achieving Alignment
There are several ways to achieve alignment. First, to avoid these risks, audits must be prioritized, with a focus on both coding accuracy and quality rather than simply speed for the sake of meeting production benchmarks. Entities should embrace a culture of compliance and develop strategic, individualized audit plans for all service lines that strike a balance between production and quality.
Second, leadership should be aware of how multifaceted and complex an auditors’ work is. Leaders should set reasonable expectations and realistic targets that account for the complexity of each medical record. They should also provide clear workflows to reduce the chaos. This would ensure certified medical auditors are allowed to conduct more comprehensive reviews and provide solid findings that benefit the organization.
And finally, achieving alignment is necessary to improve long-term accuracy. While temporary flexibility may be needed in production targets, this is an approach that ensures stability, transparency, and sustainable performance.
Contact Sonal on LinkedIn by Clicking her Name Below:
Sonal Patel, BA, CPMA, CPC, CMC
Sonal Patel, BA, CPMA, CPC, CMC is a seasoned healthcare professional with expertise in coding, auditing, and compliance.
With experience across multiple specialties, Sonal helps organizations optimize revenue, strengthen documentation, and reduce risk. Known for strong appeals strategies and deep knowledge of payer policies, Medicare, Medicaid, and LCD/NCD guidelines, she brings both precision and practicality to every engagement.
As a creator and host of the Paint the Medical Picture Podcast, Sonal shares industry insights, best practices, and inspiration to support healthcare professionals.
NAMAS BLOG Disclaimer:
The NAMAS Blog features content written by both NAMAS staff and guest contributors. Guest contributors may present opinions or perspectives that differ from those officially instructed or encouraged by NAMAS. We believe in providing space for a range of informed viewpoints to foster dialogue, reflection, and deeper understanding within the auditing and compliance community.
Some contributors may use artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the development of their content. The decision to incorporate AI is left to the discretion of the author and does not reflect an endorsement or directive from NAMAS.
If you have questions, comments, or concerns about a specific blog post, we encourage you to contact the individual author directly. Their name and contact information are provided at the end of each post.
