Consistency Starts with Conversation
Article Reference Code: NAMAS.02.13.2026
Written by: Jennifer McNamara, CEO, Healthcare Inspired LLC
Healthcare organizations invest significant time and energy in training, audits, and compliance oversight. While all of that is necessary, in my experience, some of the most critical learning does not come from formal education or audit reports. Instead, it comes from everyday moments such as a quiet question, a chart reviewed together, or a conversation that finally helps something make sense.
Peer learning often happens in the background, and over time, it has a meaningful impact on how teams function, how confident people feel in their work, how consistent decisions become, and how willing individuals are to speak up when something does not look right.
In healthcare, accuracy is essential, yes, but accuracy alone does not sustain teams or protect organizations in the long term. Coders also need confidence in their judgment, clear expectations, and reassurance that it is okay to ask questions. Those things are rarely built solely through guidelines. They are built through shared experience.
Learning Beyond the Guidelines
Coding cannot be considered static work. This is because rules change, as do payers’ expectations. Documentation varies, even within the same specialty, so no matter how long someone has been in this field, uncertainty is part of the job.
Peer learning creates space for that uncertainty to be acknowledged instead of hidden, and it allows coders to talk through real cases, explain how they arrived at a decision, and hear how someone else approached the same problem.
Maya Turner and I explore this in Guiding the Next Generation: Mentorship for Healthcare Leaders. One thing that became clear while authoring the book is that mentorship does not just improve technical skills; it changes how people see themselves in their roles.
Natasha Planck CPC-A, a medical coder who shared her experience with us, described it this way:
“My mentor is such an inspiration in more ways than one… she changed my self-esteem with coding and made me believe in my abilities again.”
That kind of confidence matters because it shows that coders who trust their judgment are more likely to ask questions, challenge unclear documentation, and apply guidelines consistently. Often, that happens before an issue ever turns into a denial or an audit finding.
How Peer Learning Shapes Teams
Coding and auditing work can be isolating because much of it is done independently, and feedback often comes only when something has gone wrong. Over time, this can make people hesitant to speak up or ask for help.
Peer learning changes the tone so that coders can review cases together or talk openly about audit feedback, making learning shared rather than punitive.
Jessica, who contributed to Guiding the Next Generation, shared something that impacted us as mentors:
“Even after I moved into another role, we continued to talk about challenges, growth, and how to lead with integrity.”
That continuity is vital since mentorship does not end when someone gains experience or changes roles. When it is rooted in values rather than hierarchy, it becomes an ongoing source of perspective and steadiness that they will need as they grow.
What Peer Learning Looks Like in Real Life
Peer learning does not have to be formal to be effective. In many organizations, it shows up in small, practical ways:
- Someone is asking for a second opinion on a complex case.
- A conversation about why an audit finding occurred.
- A newer coder listens while an experienced colleague explains their thought process.
What makes those moments work is psychological safety. People need to feel comfortable saying, “I’m not sure,” without fear of judgment.
Misty Smith, a coder and mentor, captured this:
“Mentorship is not about having all the answers. It is about sharing knowledge and inspiring confidence.”
When people feel safe asking questions, issues surface earlier, learning happens naturally, and quality improves without being forced.
Compliance Perspective
From a compliance standpoint, peer learning strengthens the first line of defense, enabling teams to talk openly about interpretation and documentation expectations and, in turn, to be more consistent in their work.
That consistency shows up in fewer surprises during audits, a more explicit rationale for coding decisions, and less rework overall. Instead of addressing issues after payment or during external review, organizations can catch concerns earlier when the impact is smaller and easier to manage.
Supporting the Next Generation
Many healthcare organizations are also navigating workforce changes. Experienced professionals are retiring or moving on, while newer coders are expected to perform at a high level quickly.
Learning Peer helps bridge that gap and allows knowledge to be passed on in context, not just in theory. This gives newer professionals time to build confidence before speed, and that is vital for maintaining quality and compliance.
A Sustainable Way Forward
Peer learning is a shared responsibility for quality, for growth, and for continuity.
When coders mentor coders, learning becomes ongoing, confidence grows quietly, and consistency becomes part of the culture rather than something enforced.
It reinforces that standards do not have to be chased because they are carried forward.
Contact Jennifer on LinkedIn by Clicking her Name Below:
Jennifer McNamara, CPC, CRC, CDEO, CPMA, CVBA, CEMA, COSC, CGSC, COPC AAPC Approved Instructor
CEO, Healthcare Inspired LLC
I bring 23 years of experience in healthcare compliance, auditing, clinical documentation, revenue cycle optimization, and payer strategy. I am the Founder and CEO of Healthcare Inspired LLC, a national healthcare consulting firm that partners with medical practices, hospitals, and ambulatory surgery centers to strengthen compliance, optimize operations, and protect revenue. I hold extensive industry credentials — CPC, CDEO, CRC, CPMA, CVBA, CEMA,COSC, CGSC, COPC, CPCI — reflecting deep expertise in regulatory compliance, coding, auditing, documentation integrity, and revenue cycle management. I am known for translating complex regulations, payer policies, and data into practical, defensible strategies healthcare organizations can implement with confidence.
NAMAS BLOG Disclaimer:
The NAMAS Blog features content written by both NAMAS staff and guest contributors. Guest contributors may present opinions or perspectives that differ from those officially instructed or encouraged by NAMAS. We believe in providing space for a range of informed viewpoints to foster dialogue, reflection, and deeper understanding within the auditing and compliance community.
Some contributors may use artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the development of their content. The decision to incorporate AI is left to the discretion of the author and does not reflect an endorsement or directive from NAMAS.
If you have questions, comments, or concerns about a specific blog post, we encourage you to contact the individual author directly. Their name and contact information are provided at the end of each post.
