Developing a Comprehensive Coding and Auditing Plan for 2026
Article Reference Code: NAMAS.12.26.2025
Written by: Lindsey Chatelain, CPC, CRC
Accurate medical coding and auditing are fundamental to maintaining compliance, optimizing reimbursement, and safeguarding the integrity of clinical documentation. While there is often an expectation that coders will identify and correct every discrepancy, the reality is far more complex. Medical coding is influenced by numerous factors, including provider documentation, payer requirements, and evolving regulatory standards. These complexities mean that even the most skilled coders cannot guarantee perfection without a structured system in place. When theory does not align with practice, organizations must adopt proactive strategies to mitigate risk and enhance performance.
Developing a strong coding and auditing plan begins with education. Continuing education for both providers and coders is essential to keep pace with annual code set changes and regulatory updates. Many coders enter the profession without formal training, and even those who have completed coursework often struggle to retain knowledge due to the complexity of coding systems. Smaller practices face additional challenges, as coders may lack access to advanced resources or mentorship opportunities. For this reason, assessing the knowledge base of each coder is a critical first step. Understanding what they know—and where gaps exist—allows organizations to provide targeted resources and support that strengthen expertise and improve accuracy.
Provider education is equally important. Documentation serves as the foundation for coding, and incomplete or unclear records can lead to errors that affect compliance and reimbursement. Conducting an internal review of a sample of provider notes helps identify areas where additional training or documentation improvements are needed. After this review, scheduling a meeting with the provider to discuss findings and outline actionable steps ensures that feedback is constructive and collaborative. This approach not only improves documentation quality but also fosters a culture of shared responsibility for compliance.
Internal quality assurance should be conducted regularly, with timely feedback provided to both providers and coders. While there is no universally mandated frequency for internal audits, increasing their regularity significantly reduces compliance risk. Frequent audits allow organizations to detect and correct errors early, preventing issues from escalating into costly denials or regulatory penalties. Timely feedback is essential, as it reinforces best practices and helps both providers and coders understand where improvements are needed.
In addition to internal audits, it is considered best practice to engage an independent third party to audit services annually. External audits provide unbiased feedback on areas of opportunity or concern, ensuring objectivity in evaluating compliance and performance. These audits offer several benefits, including identifying gaps that internal teams may overlook, validating the effectiveness of existing processes, and reinforcing trust with stakeholders by demonstrating a commitment to transparency. Ultimately, the purpose of seeking this feedback is to strengthen billing practices and maintain robust compliance standards across the organization.
A comprehensive coding and billing audit involves multiple phases designed to ensure accuracy and compliance. The process begins with planning and preparation, where auditors define the scope, objectives, and gather necessary documentation. Next, a representative sample of claims is reviewed to assess coding accuracy and documentation completeness, verifying that services billed align with clinical records and comply with ICD-10, CPT, and HCPCS guidelines. Auditors also check for regulatory compliance with Medicare, Medicaid, commercial payers, and internal standards. Errors such as incorrect codes, incomplete documentation, or unbundled billing are identified and analyzed, followed by a detailed report outlining findings, trends, and corrective recommendations. Feedback is then provided to the coding and billing teams, and a corrective action plan is implemented. Finally, follow-up audits confirm improvements and support ongoing compliance, reducing risk and strengthening operational integrity.
Ultimately, an effective coding and auditing plan cannot be one-size-fits-all. Each organization has unique needs, resources, and operational priorities. Tailoring the plan to fit these factors ensures it is practical, sustainable, and aligned with organizational goals. By combining education, regular audits, constructive feedback, and documentation improvement initiatives, organizations can build a framework that promotes accuracy, compliance, and financial integrity across the revenue cycle.
If you have questions about this article or it’s content- Click here to connect with Lindsey on LinkedIn

Lindsey Chatelain, CPC, CRC, Director Of Business Services at Ogden Clinic
Lindsey has over 20 years of experience in multi-specialty healthcare including auditing, coding, revenue cycle, physician credentialing, compliance and payer contracting. Lindsey is credentialed by the American Academy of Professional Coders in CPC and CRC coding. She received her Bachelor of Science in Healthcare Management from Colorado Technical University.
NAMAS BLOG Disclaimer:
The NAMAS Blog features content written by both NAMAS staff and guest contributors. Guest contributors may present opinions or perspectives that differ from those officially instructed or encouraged by NAMAS. We believe in providing space for a range of informed viewpoints to foster dialogue, reflection, and deeper understanding within the auditing and compliance community.
Some contributors may use artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the development of their content. The decision to incorporate AI is left to the discretion of the author and does not reflect an endorsement or directive from NAMAS.
If you have questions, comments, or concerns about a specific blog post, we encourage you to contact the individual author directly. Their name and contact information are provided at the end of each post.












